Make your own free website on
« April 2019 »
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
You are not logged in. Log in
Freedom Is Not Free
Thursday, 24 April 2008
My Podcast "Littlebird wants to know why?"
Now Playing: My Podcast of many songs for troops and more
Topic: Our America is going...

Posted by littlebirdtheoutcast at 11:05 AM EDT
Are the Chrisians going to loose their bibles? Are our troops being brainwashed?
Now Playing: 3 Articles by Ted Pike, are we going to lose our bibles? Plus one more for the troops, and families
Topic: + abuse to our troops,

If you choose to visit his site:


By Rev. Ted Pike  

            The Southern Poverty Law Center, prominent Jewish “civil liberties” group, recently alerted 300,000 influential people—including human rights groups, politicians and 60,000 law enforcement officers—that Rev. Ted Pike's National Prayer Network and Traditional Values Coalition (TVC) are both "active U.S. hate groups." SPLC calls us dangerous extremist organizations. It wants police and government to watch us closely. (See,

            TVC is a mainstream evangelical, ardently pro-Zionist watchdog group. Its head is Jewish Christian, Louis P. Sheldon.

            How did this group make it on SPLC’s “Year in Hate” list? TVC opposes hate crime laws and the homosexual agenda. For this reason, SPLC lists it beside Fred Phelps' fanatics, the Klan and skinheads. Jewish activist groups want to increasingly broaden the terms "hate" and "anti-Semitism" to include evangelicals.

            The Jewish-controlled “Office of Global Anti-Semitism” in the U.S. State Department joins SPLC in attempts to marginalize Christians.  Eighty-two percent of American evangelical Christians support Israel; but the State Department says they are anti-Semites if they believe the New Testament account of Jewish complicity in the crucifixion (See, Bible is Hate, says U.S. Government)!

            Jewish activists thus display a truly hateful intent—to harm Christians and deprive them of freedom. Such activists work to warp public and government perceptions of Christian conservatives—demonizing us as potential sources of “homophobic,” anti-Semitic bigotry and possible violence. SPLC alleges a 48 percent increase of threat from the "radical right" since 2000. Jewish attack groups such as the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, American Civil Liberties Union, and People for the American Way, smear “homophobic” evangelicals as being part of this “threat.”

            After defaming Christians as "haters," Jewish supremacists want to actually outlaw Christian political activity and evangelism. The ADL created hate crime laws that will particularly outlaw reproof of sodomy and evangelism of non-Christians, especially Jews.  

            In 1971, Canadian ADL succeeded in Canada. It lobbied for 15 years before the Canadian Parliament adopted its federal hate crimes law. Today Canadian Christians and Christian ministries can’t publicly criticize homosexuality or Judaism. American broadcasters like Dr. Dobson and Dr. Laura Schlessinger (Jewish) must edit criticism of homosexuality before airing on Canadian radio and television. (Needless to say, these mainstream broadcasters would never criticize matters Jewish.)

            In America, our free speech is threatened. In Canada, Australia, and many European countries where hate laws prevail, it is only a memory.

Hard-to-Please Jews

            Christians can no longer please Jewish supremacists with passion for Israel. Militant Jewish watchdog groups want more. They want evangelicals to follow the example of Dr. John Hagee and affirm that:

1. Jews don't have to believe in Christ for salvation.
2. Jews should not be evangelized.
3. The name of Jesus should not be used in public ceremonies involving Jews, or in the presence of Jews.
4. Jews and Judaism should not be viewed as incomplete without Christ.
5. Jews did not mastermind the crucifixion.   
6. New Testament Christianity is a primary cause of anti-Semitism leading to the Holocaust. (See, John Hagee: False Prophet)

            In other words, Christians must now deny their Lord and divest themselves of the New Testament fundamentals of their faith. To do less is to remain “haters” in the eye of activist Jews.

            Jewish activists also want evangelical leaders to follow Hagee in doing nothing effective to oppose their hate crime laws.

            As the most powerful Jewish activist group, influencing a galaxy of lesser Jewish left-wing organizations, ADL is impatient to begin persecution of American Christians. It hopes to do this by restricting “homophobic hate speech” on the internet and passage of its federal hate crimes bill next winter. Although repeatedly defeated in its attempt to pass federal hate crimes legislation, ADL continually manifests its tremendous power and influence through a multitude of propaganda outlets, from the international to the local level. Rep. John Rarick quoted Sen. Jack Tenney of California in the Congressional Record: “The CIA and FBI are tinker toys compared to the ADL.” (Congressional Record, Dec. 6, 1971)  

            No President rules without pleasing ADL.  One of the first things George Bush did after winning the presidency was to have an extended visit with ADL.  Last week, he spoke by video to ADL's National Leadership Conference in New York City.  He said ADL, as one of America's great civil rights organizations, is "a leading voice for freedom and equality." (Watch the video from ADL's website)

            Goodbye to any illusion that Pres. Bush would buck ADL by vetoing their cherished hate crimes bill!

            Everyone in Congress bows before ADL.  This includes Republican leaders representing the religious right.  Former House Minority Whip Rep. Roy Blunt (R-Missouri) has been a bulwark of opposition to ADL's federal hate crimes bill for many years. Yet he was present at ADL's recent convention, speaking ADL-friendly platitudes. If he doesn't, he knows he could face defeat in the next election.

            For the past 30 years, evangelical leaders have vilified the ACLU, ignoring ADL because it was conspicuously Jewish. Now, although they never publicly mention ADL as a threat, privately they must be increasingly aware that ADL is out to get them. Yet, all evangelicals still think the world of Israel! The truth is, ADL and Israel are one. ADL is the unregistered agent of a foreign nation, Israel, in violation of the 1937 Foreign Agents Registration Act. ADL, Mossad, Israel, and a myriad of well-funded, anti-Christian, Jewish activist groups all work in concert toward one goal: elevation of Jewish power in America, the Mid-East, and the world. This includes persecution of Christian evangelism through hate laws and restrictions in America, the Mid-East, and the world. (See, Christians in Israel: An Endangered Species)

            Incredibly, there exists another massive, widespread, and potentially super-powerful group that also is an unregistered agent for Zionism in all its forms.  It is the very group Jewish supremacists want to marginalize, persecute, and destroy.

            It’s at least 40 million American evangelicals.



           Rev. Ted Pike is director of the National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative watchdog organization.  

           Let the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith teach you how they have saddled 45 states with hate laws capable of persecuting Christians:

           Learn how ADL took away free speech in Canada and wants to steal it now in the U.S. Congress. Watch Rev. Ted Pike's Hate Laws: Making Criminals of Christians at Purchase this gripping documentary to show at church. Order online at for $24.90, DVD or VHS, by calling 503-853-3688, or at the address below.

           TALK SHOW HOSTS: Interview Rev. Ted Pike on this subject. Call (503) 631-3808.


NATIONAL PRAYER NETWORK, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015

[To unsubscribe from this list, reply with "unsubscribe" in the subject field.]




By Rev. Ted Pike  

            Has the religious right "hijacked" the National Day of Prayer to exclude other faiths? The anti-evangelical watchdog group "Jews on First" claims it has.  It says the National Day of Prayer Taskforce (associated with Dr. Dobson's Focus on the Family) discriminates against non-Christian Jews who want to participate in this Christian organization. It alleges that many other Christian national prayer groups should be prevented from similar discrimination. Jews on First says such organizations violate non-Christians' civil rights by requiring members be Christian.

            Jews on First is now organizing a national protest. They offer two options to state governors: rescind their annual proclamation of the May 1st National Day of Prayer; or substitute it with an "Inclusive National Day of Prayer."

            These Jewish activists claim their protest has been joined by "dozens of religious, civil rights, and social justice organizations."

False Problem

            Jews on First has everything upside down. The National Day of Prayer was proclaimed in 1775 by Gen. George Washington to encourage all religions to promote fasting and prayer in their own ways.  Recent massive observance was spearheaded by Focus on the Family in the late eighties. Dr. Dobson's group encouraged observance from a Christian perspective yet made it abundantly clear that people of all religions are welcome to observe the National Day of Prayer as they see fit. Nothing prevents Jews, Muslims, etc. from creating their own national prayer committees to contribute to this historic, national observance.

            But Jews on First claims that Christians' celebration of this day is discriminatory! It says Dobson's organization violates separation of church and state by promoting state ceremonies with governors. This might give the impression that government participated in religion! Jews on First claims this violates the First Amendment.

            The issue of national prayer is of special concern to our National Prayer Network. Despite Focus on the Family's creation of a National Prayer Committee in 1972, the National Day of Prayer was largely forgotten by 1980.  My father, Rev. Claude Pike, was very concerned. He saw this day's powerful potential to help bring spiritual revival and restoration to our nation. To publicize its reestablishment, during the summer of 1980, my father, my brother John and I flew our 1929 Bellanca (the first type to fly the Pacific in 1931) thousands of miles across America. Our ancient monoplane towed a huge banner urging "Pray for America!" Through a deafening loudspeaker on the plane's belly, we proclaimed this message over many U.S. cities and patriotic rallies. We flew from Portland, Oregon almost to New York, through the South to Los Angeles and back to Portland. During 1980-1, our promotion was the only concerted national effort to restore the National Day of Prayer, generating widespread publicity. In response, Pres. Reagan invited my father and other new right leaders to the White House. On February 6th, 1982, they witnessed him sign a proclamation that the National Day of Prayer be observed on the 1st Thursday of May every year.

            As religious leaders joined with us, we had a number of meetings in Washington, D.C. (primarily under the new leadership of Dr. Bill and Vonette Bright of Campus Crusade) to chart the course of public observance of the National Day of Prayer. From the beginning, such leaders were very forthright in welcoming persons of all faiths, especially Jews. They encouraged every group to create their own organization and promote the National Day of Prayer in their own way.

            Christian evangelical groups eagerly created national and local prayer committees. Today there are 40,000 Christian-oriented events on the 1st Thursday of every May. Jews, however, do not respond in the same way. Virtually no synagogues participate. After Pres. Reagan's 1982 proclamation, the Jewish-dominated American Civil Liberties Union tried to bring a federal lawsuit to stop government endorsement of the National Day of Prayer. (See, ACLU Top Heavy with Jews) Fortunately, Congress approved the National Day of Prayer in 1988 and the ACLU backed off. But the present campaign by Jews on First is more of the same. Typically, Jews on First does not recommend that Jews form their own prayer committees. Instead they demand penetration into Christian groups or else, incredibly, an end of the National Day of Prayer completely!

Will Christians Resist?

            Unfortunately, because Jews on First is so conspicuously Jewish, it is virtually certain no Christian evangelical organization -- or media -- will breathe a word of warning before or after May 1. Consider the prevailing mindset of evangelicals: a divine curse attends those who oppose God's "chosen people." Opposition to Jews would mean losing vast support from "Israel-first" followers.

            This leaves Jews on First virtually unchallenged in their campaign to subvert and de-Christianize the National Day of Prayer. This also leaves the National Prayer Network, and you, as the only opposition to yet another offensive by liberal Jewish activists to strip Christian America of its values, symbols and heritage.

            The campaign by Jews on First can snowball in its effectiveness if their distorted point of view is all governors hear before May 1.  Make your voice heard NOW.  Send the following letter (perhaps as a petition with signatures from your church) to your governor:

Dear Governor:

            In 1775 George Washington proclaimed the National Day of Prayer as a day to be participated in by all Americans. He wished members of all faiths to organize and promote this solemn and reverent occasion as they saw fit.

            Many Christian organizations promote the National Day of Prayer from a Christian perspective. They encourage other faiths to similarly organize and participate in their own ways.

            Yet some now accuse these Christian organizations of "discrimination" because they require their members to be Christian.  These critics request governors to proclaim an "Inclusive National Day of Prayer" -- or issue no proclamation whatever!

            Instead of changing the National Day of Prayer, these groups should organize their own National Day of Prayer committees, observing the National Day of Prayer in as they prefer.  

            This honors the wishes of Presidents Washington, Lincoln, Truman, and Reagan, signers of National Day of Prayer proclamations.

            Please do not amend your annual proclamation of the National Day of Prayer. Do not change either its title or the date, the 1st Thursday of May, since these were both established upon the wishes of our Presidents and Congresses.  Thank you very much.










Highlights of the Pike's role in helpingto reestablish the National Day of Prayer:

Spring, 1980

Rev. Claude Pike, John Pike, Ted Pike prepare 1929 "Old Glory" Bellanca for publicity tour around America, drawing attention for the need to revive the National Day of Prayer.


August, 1980

"Old Glory" flies above towns and cities across America towing an aerial banner, with "PRAY FOR AMERICA" booming from a powerful amplifier.


September 6, 1980

"Old Glory" returns, laden with thousands of signed petitions calling upon the President to re-instate the National Day of Prayer.


February 6, 1982

President Reagan, before Rev. Pike and other national religious leaders, signs the proclamation requiring that the first Thursday in May be observed as National Day of Prayer.



           Rev. Ted Pike is director of the National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative watchdog organization.  

           Let the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith teach you how they have saddled 45 states with hate laws capable of persecuting Christians:

           Learn how ADL took away free speech in Canada and wants to steal it now in the U.S. Congress. Watch Rev. Ted Pike's Hate Laws: Making Criminals of Christians at Purchase this gripping documentary to show at church. Order online at for $24.90, DVD or VHS, by calling 503-853-3688, or at the address below.

           TALK SHOW HOSTS: Interview Rev. Ted Pike on this subject. Call (503) 631-3808.


NATIONAL PRAYER NETWORK, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015

[To unsubscribe from this list, reply with "unsubscribe" in the subject field.]




By Rev. Ted Pike  

            The U.S. State Dept.’s Office of Global Anti-Semitism now says the New Testament is a book of conspiracy theory! Yes, our government now rules that the Biblical record that Jews had Christ crucified is not only anti-Semitic; it’s conspiracy junk. This step toward criminalization of Christian beliefs directly threatens believers. It is also an act of blatant hypocrisy: While the New Testament is derided as “hate speech,” not a word is said about the seething hatred contained in Judaism's most sacred book, the Talmud.

            The State Department reports, "The tactics of many anti-Semitic groups include the propagation of conspiracy theories… Traditional conspiracy theories…" include the belief   "…that the Jews are responsible for the death of Christ." 1 For tens of millions, the New Testament is anything but conspiracy theory! It’s the written Word of God.

            But now our State Department says the New Testament account of Christ’s passion, culminating in rejection by the Jewish people and crucifixion by the Romans, is akin to the other conspiracy theories that inspired Hitler to attempt to destroy Jews. My previous article, “Bible is Hate, Says U.S. Government,” documents the State Department's other charge: that the New Testament espouses "classic anti-Semitism." 2

            Hitler is rightly considered a classic anti-Semite. But the State Department, in also labelling the New Testament "classic anti-Semitism," suggests it is morally and intellectually similar to Nazism. This implies the New Testament could lead to yet another Holocaust! This premise, legislated into “anti-hate” laws, will justify persecution of Bible-believers as “anti-Semites.”  After all, it will be reasoned, people with hateful ideologies, leading to violence against Jews should be restricted, even imprisoned.

Talmud Tells Us Who Killed Christ

            Abraham H. Foxman, head of the Jewish Anti-Defamation League, couldn't agree more with the State Department. His organization is the prime mover behind hate laws worldwide and the Office of Global Anti-Semitism. Foxman asserts that Jews of Jesus’ time were innocent of the crucifixion; it was entirely the work of Romans. Foxman says New Testament writers concocted the vicious anti-Semitic lie that Jewish leaders and people goaded Pilate to condemn Christ. He says this falsehood — that Jews are "Christ killers"—fanned into flame nearly two millennia of anti-Semitism and led to the Holocaust. He also says it creates "new anti-Semitism" which he warns is rapidly escalating worldwide. 3 ADL's “anti-hate” laws have already been used in dozens of western nations to infringe on the freedom of Christians.

            Foxman, as an Orthodox Jew, knows plenty about another book whose vitriol is far darker than that of the Bible. The highest religious and ethical authority of modern Judaism, the Babylonian Talmud, states that Jewish leaders did have Christ condemned to death. In fact, the Talmud says they did it entirely without the Romans’ help! Jewish authorities killed Christ not by crucifixion (illegal in Jewish law) but by the legal methods prescribed by Talmudic law.

            The Talmud says:

On Passover Eve, they hanged Jesus of Nazareth. And the herald went before him forty days, and proclaimed ‘Jesus of Nazareth is going out to be stoned because he practiced sorcery, incited and led Israel astray. Whoever knows of an argument that may be proposed in his favor should come present that argument on his behalf.’ But the judges did not find an argument in his favor, and so they hanged him on Passover Eve. 4

            The Talmud describes torture inflicted on Jesus before His death. “All four legal methods of execution – stoning, burning, decapitation and strangling were employed”. 5 The Talmud elaborates on “burning.” It involved Jesus being:

“lowered in dung up to his armpits, then a hard cloth was placed within a soft one, wound around his neck and the two ends pulled in opposite directions until he was dead, forcing him to open his mouth. A wick was then lit, and thrown into his mouth, so that it descended into his body, burning his bowels.” 6

            Jesus, says the Talmud, was excommunicated for the thought of seducing a woman. In His ensuing grief and confusion, He fell down and worshipped a brick. 7 The Talmud says Jesus “…was a fool and we do not pay attention to what fools do.” 8 According to the Talmud, Jesus is now in hell, writhing in eternal agony. The Talmud asks: “‘What is your punishment?’ He replied, ‘With boiling hot semen…’” 9

            The Talmud defends the Jewish rulers who it says righteously executed four of Christ’s disciples: Matthew, Luke, Nicodemus, and Thaddaeus. 10 It considers His followers to be worshippers of a false prophet and worthy of death. References in the Talmud to Christ and Christians are often veiled by terms not understood by Christian censors in previous centuries. Two of the most common are “Minim” and “Minith.” The footnote to the Talmud in Abodah Zarah 16b (pg. 84) says that “Minith” refers to “…heresy with special reference to Christianity.”

            Brotherly love did not extend to the Minim: Christians may be legally thrown into a pit to die. As Abodah Zarah 26b says: “…‘idolaters and [Jewish] Shepherds of small cattle need not be brought up, though they must not be cast in, but Minim, informers, and apostates may be cast in and need not be brought up.’” In Shabbethai 116, Rabbi Tarbon says, “The writings of the Minim [New Testament] deserve to be burned, even though the holy name of God occurs therein, for paganism is less dangerous than Minith [Christianity]…”

            According to the Talmud "…Those who deny the Torah and the prophets of Israel [giving loyalty to the "false prophet" Jesus and the New Testament], the law is that they should be killed and those who have the power of life and death should have them killed. And if this cannot be done, they should be led to their death by deceptive methods. 11

Christians: Keep Out!

            Concerning Gentile Christians who presume to make use of the Jewish Sabbath, The Jewish Encyclopedia tells us, “Resh Lakish…said, ‘A Gentile observing the Sabbath deserves death’ (Sanh. 58b)." This article says, “The Sabbath is a sign between God and Israel alone…” and the Talmud's death sentence "was probably directed against the Christian Jews…” 12 Sanh. 59a says, “A heathen who studies the Torah [Old Testament] deserves death, for it is written, Moses commanded us a law for an inheritance; it is our inheritance not theirs.”

            Christianity is vividly described in the Talmud as worse than even the most wicked behavior of a Jew. A.Z. 17a says: “Rabbi Eleazar B. Dordia did not leave out any harlot in the world without coming to her…" yet attained forgiveness because he had not committed the unforgivable sin of accepting Christianity. Likewise, incest is a “light sin” compared to faith in Jesus. The Talmud tells us “Minuth,” along with the Roman government, are the two daughters of hell. One seduces Jews to idolatry; the other keeps them politically bound.

            Does the Talmud teach the same “tolerance” and “respect for diversity” which Foxman demands from Christians toward Jews, homosexuals, abortionists, and pornographers? Listen to how the Talmud instructs Jews to respond to the death of a Jew who has become a Christian:

At the death of one who had severed all ties with his people no rites whatever should be observed. His brothers and relatives should dress in white and cloak themselves in white. They should eat, drink and be merry, for an enemy of God has perished. As it is written, ‘Do not I hate them, O Lord, that hate Thee? And do not I strive with those that rise up against Thee? I hate them with utmost hatred; I count them my enemies.’ (Psalms 139:21-4)” 13

            Is this “hate?” Absolutely!  

            It's hard to imagine greater hate than the Talmud teaches against Christ and Christians. Jewish “civil liberties” groups such as ADL, ACLU, Southern Poverty Law Center, and People for the American Way set themselves up as lawgivers to the world. They propose to end “hate, intolerance, prejudice, and bias.” Yet, the greatest religious and ethical authority for modern observant Judaism, the Talmud (which far exceeds the authority of the Old Testament for religious Jews) 14, cannot be surpassed in its hate, intolerance, prejudice, and bias against Christians. Chief among Jewish ethical pontificators is Abe Foxman, a devout Orthodox, Talmud-quoting Jew, who says he earnestly awaits the coming of Israel’s “messiah.” This, of course, is not Jesus but Antichrist. 15


                        With this in mind we can understand why Jewish activist groups exhibit such a loathing of Jesus and His name in public schools, government and the military and why they tirelessly labor to remove all symbols having to do with Him, especially at Christmas and Easter.

Jewish activists accuse evangelicals of “homophobia,” preaching hate against homosexuals. Actually, out of love, Christians warn sodomites that, unless they repent, their sexual perversion will land them in hell forever. In contrast, Jewish activists are consummate “Christophobes,” opposing Christ and His followers -- not out of love but from a morbid obsession to remove all memory of what their forefathers did, screaming, “Crucify Him! Crucify Him! His blood be upon us and our children!”

            Like Lady Macbeth, who washed her murderous hands incessantly, muttering, “Out, out, damned spot!” the descendants of those who had Christ killed attempt to wash away their guilt with lies.

There’s only One, however, who can wash away anyone’s sins. Scripture repeatedly promises He will come again and “…they shall look upon Me whom they have pierced and they shall mourn…” 16 He who makes the vilest sinners clean will put “a heart of flesh” in Israel, wherein now resides “a heart of stone” against Him. At last God will remove the obsession to defame Him out of Israel.

            The saga of Christ’s dealings with the Jews is thus one of radical extremes: vitriolic hate, as Talmudic Jewry strives to prevent His appearance, and astonishing love, as Christ eventually proves His power to save a whole nation of repentant Jews.

            Someday all the earth will gasp in amazement saying, “Who is a God like unto Thee, that pardoneth iniquity and passeth by the transgression of the remnant of His heritage?” 17



1. See, Contemporary Global Anti-Semitism: A Report Provided to the United States Congress, p. 31.
2. See, Bible is Hate, says U.S. Government.
3. See, ADL's Foxman: New Testament is Anti-Semitic.
4. The Babylonian Talmud, translated by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz, Random House, New York, 1989 - ca.97.
5. “Balaam,” Jewish Encyclopedia, pg. 469.
6. Mishnah, Sanhedrin, 52a, The Babylonian Talmud, Soncino Press, 1948, London.
7. Sanhedrin, 107b. This is confirmed by The Jewish Encyclopedia article on "Jesus," p.170.
8. Sanhedrin 67a, cited. in The Talmud Unmasked, by Rev. I. B. Pranaitis, p. 34. A number of anti-Christian and Gentile passages of the Talmud, too inflammatory to be included in the 1948 Soncino translation, are presented in this credible work by a dedicated scholar and Hebraist. Many of these passages resurfaced in Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz’s recent translation of the Talmud. The Talmud Unmasked is available from Christian Book Club, P.O. Box 566, Palmdale, CA, 93550. ph. (661)274-2240
9. Gittin, 57b.
10. Sanhedrin 43a.
11. Choschen Hammishpat, 156 Haggah.
12. "Gentiles," Jewish Encyclopedia, p. 623.
13. Treatise Semahot, ch. 2, p. 35; translated by Dov Zlotnick of the Jewish Theological Seminary, New Haven and London, 1966.
14. Articles on “Talmud” and “Authority” in the three major encyclopedias of Judaism, The Jewish Encyclopedia, The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, and The Encyclopedia Judaica, agree on the Talmud’s vastly greater authority.
15. See, ADL's Foxman: Man of Faith?
16. Zechariah 12:10.
17. Micah 7:18


           Rev. Ted Pike is director of the National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative watchdog organization.  

           Let the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith teach you how they have saddled 45 states with hate laws capable of persecuting Christians:

           Learn how ADL took away free speech in Canada and wants to steal it now in the U.S. Congress. Watch Rev. Ted Pike's Hate Laws: Making Criminals of Christians at Purchase this gripping documentary to show at church. Order online at for $24.90, DVD or VHS, by calling 503-853-3688, or at the address below.

           TALK SHOW HOSTS: Interview Rev. Ted Pike on this subject. Call (503) 631-3808.


NATIONAL PRAYER NETWORK, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015

[To unsubscribe from this list, reply with "unsubscribe" in the subject field.]


It may be better if you copy and paste the link above?

THE RAPE OF THE MIND: The Psychology of Thought Control, Menticide, and Brainwashing, by Joost A. M. Meerloo, M.D., Instructor in Psychiatry, Columbia University Lecturer in Social Psychology, New School for Social Research, Former Chief, Psychological Department, Netherlands Forces, published in 1956, World Publishing Company. (Out of Print)


The first part of this book is devoted to various techniques used to make man a meek conformist. In addition to actual political occurrences, attention is called to some ideas born in the laboratory and to the drug techniques that facilitate brainwashing. The last chapter deals with the subtle psychological mechanisms of mental submission.


A fantastic thing is happening in our world. Today a man is no longer punished only for the crimes he has in fact committed. Now he may be compelled to confess to crimes that have been conjured up by his judges, who use his confession for political purposes. It is not enough for us to damn as evil those who sit in judgment. We must understand what impels the false admission of guilt; we must take another look at the human mind in all its frailty and vulnerability.

The Enforced Confession

During the Korean War, an officer of the United States Marine Corps, Colonel Frank H. Schwable, was taken prisoner by the Chinese Communists. After months of intense psychological pressure and physical degradation, he signed a well documented "confession" that the United States was carrying on bacteriological warfare against the enemy. The confession named names, cited missions, described meetings and strategy conferences. This was a tremendously valuable propaganda tool for the totalitarians. They cabled the news all over the world: "The United States of America is fighting the peace loving people of China by dropping bombs loaded with disease spreading bacteria, in violation of international law."

After his repatriation, Colonel Schwable issued a sworn statement repudiating his confession, and describing his long months of imprisonment. Later, he was brought before a military court of inquiry. He testified in his own defense before that court: "I was never convinced in my own mind that we in the First Marine Air Wing had used bug warfare. I knew we hadn't, but the rest of it was real to me the conferences, the planes, and how they would go about their missions."

"The words were mine," the Colonel continued, "but the thoughts were theirs. That is the hardest thing I have to explain: how a man can sit down and write something he knows is false, and yet, to sense it, to feel it, to make it seem real."

This is the way Dr. Charles W. Mayo, a leading American physician and government representative, explained brainwashig in an official statement before the United Nations: "...the tortures used...although they include many brutal physical injuries, are not like the medieval torture of the rack and the thumb screw. They are subtler, more prolonged, and intended to be more terrible in their effect. They are calculated to disintegrate the mind of an intelligent victim, to distort his sense of values, to a point where he will not simply cry out 'I did it!' but will become a seemingly willing accomplice to the complete disintegration of his integrity and the production of an elaborate fiction."

The Schwable case is but one example of a defenseless prisoner being compelled to tell a big lie. If we are to survive as free men, we must face up to this problem of politically inspired mental coercion, with all its ramifications.

It is more than twenty years [in 1956] since psychologists first began to suspect that the human mind can easily fall prey to dictatorial powers. In 1933, the German Reichstag building was burned to the ground. The Nazis arrested a Dutchman, Marinus Van der Lubbe, and accused him of the crime. Van der Lubbe was known by Dutch psychiatrists to be mentally unstable. He had been a patient in a mental institution in Holland. And his weakness and lack of mental balance became apparent to the world when he appeared before the court. Wherever news of the trial reached, men wondered: "Can that foolish little fellow be a heroic revolutionary, a man who is willing to sacrifice his life to an ideal?"

During the court sessions Van der Lubbe was evasive, dull, and apathetic. Yet the reports of the Dutch psychiatrists described him as a gay, alert, unstable character, a man whose moods changed rapidly, who liked to vagabond around, and who had all kinds of fantasies about changing the world.

On the forty second day of the trial, Van der Lubbe's behavior changed dramatically. His apathy disappeared. It became apparent that he had been quite aware of everything that had gone on during the previous sessions. He criticized the slow course of the procedure. He demanded punishment either by imprisonment or death. He spoke about his "inner voices." He insisted that he had his moods in check. Then he fell back into apathy. We now recognize these symptoms as a combination of behavior forms which we can call a confession syndrome. In 1933 this type of behavior was unknown to psychiatrists. Unfortunately, it is very familiar today and is frequently met in cases of extreme mental coercion.

Van der Lubbe was subsequently convicted and executed. When the trial was over, the world began to realize that he had merely been a scapegoat. The Nazis themselves had burned down the Reichstag building and had staged the crime and the trial so that they could take over Germany. Still later we realized that Van der Lubbe was the victim of a diabolically clever misuse of medical knowledge and psychologic technique, through which he had been transformed into a useful, passive, meek automaton, who replied merely yes or no to his interrogators during most of the court sessions. In a few moments he threatened to jump out of his enforced role. Even at that time there were rumors that the man had been drugged into submission, though we never became sure of that.

[NOTE: The psychiatric report about the case of Van der Lubbe is published by Bonhoeffer and Zutt. Though they were unfamiliar with the "menticide syndrome," and not briefed by their political fuehrers, they give a good description about the pathologic, apathetic behavior, and his tremendous change of moods. They deny the use of drugs.]

Between 1936 and 1938 the world became more conscious of the very real danger of systematized mental coercion in the field of politics. This was the period of the well remembered Moscow purge trials. It was almost impossible to believe that dedicated old Bolsheviks, who had given their lives to a revolutionary movement, had suddenly turned into dastardly traitors. When, one after another, everyone of the accused confessed and beat his breast, the general reaction was that this was a great show of deception, intended only as a propaganda move for the non Communist world. Then it became apparent that a much worse tragedy was being enacted. The men on trial had once been human beings. Now they were being systematically changed into puppets. Their puppeteers called the tune, manipulated their actions. When, from time to time, news came through showing how hard, rigid revolutionaries could be changed into meek, self accusing sheep, all over the world the last remnants of the belief in the free community presumably being built in Soviet Russia began to crumble.

In recent years, the spectacle of confession to uncommitted crimes has become more and more common. The list ranges from Communist through non Communist to anti Communist, and includes men of such different types as the Czech Bolshevik Rudolf Slansky and the Hungarian cardinal, Joseph Mindszenty.

Mental Coercion and Enemy Occupation

Those of us who lived in the Nazi occupied countries during the Second World War learned to understand only too well how people could be forced into false confessions, and into betrayals of those they loved. I myself was born in the Netherlands and lived there until the Nazi occupation forced me to flee. In the early days of the occupation, when we heard the first eyewitness descriptions of what happened during Nazi interrogations of captured resistance workers, we were frightened and alarmed.

The first aim of the Gestapo was to force prisoners under torture to betray their friends and to report new victims for further torture. The Brown Shirts demanded names and more names, not bothering to ascertain whether or not they were given falsely under the stress of terror. I remember very clearly one meeting held by a small group of resisters to discuss the growing fear and insecurity. Everybody at that meeting could expect to be mentioned and picked up by the Gestapo at some time. Should we be able to stand the Nazi treatment, or would we also be forced to become informers? This question was being asked by anti Nazis in all the occupied countries.

During the second year of the occupation we realized that it was better not to be in touch with one another. More than two contacts were unsafe. We tried to find medical and psychiatric preventives to harden us against the Nazi torture we expected. As a matter of fact, I myself conducted some experiments to determine whether or not narcotics would harden us against pain. However, the results were paradoxical. Narcotics can create pain insensitivity, but their dulling action at the same time makes people more vulnerable to mental pressure. Even at that time we knew, as did the Nazis themselves, that it was not the direct physical pain that broke people, but the continuous humiliation and mental torture. One of my patients, who was subjected to such an interrogation, managed to remain silent. He refused to answer a single question, and finally the Nazis dismissed him. But he never recovered from this terrifying experience. He hardly spoken even when he returned home. He simply sat bitter, full of indignation and in a few weeks he died. It was not his physical wounds that had killed him; it was the combination of fear and wounded pride.

We held many discussions about ways of strengthening our captured underground workers or preventing them from final self betrayal. Should some of our people be given suicide capsules? That could only be a last resort. Narcotics like morphine give only a temporary anesthesia and relief; moreover, the enemy would certainly find the capsules and take them away.

We had heard about German attempts to give cocaine and amphetamine to their air pilots for use in combat exhaustion, but neither medicament was reliable. Those drugs might revive the body by making it less sensitive to pain, but at the same time they dulled the mind. If captured members of the underground were to take them, as experiments had shown, their bodies might not feel the effects of phyiscal torture, but their hazy minds might turn them into easier dupes of the Nazis.

We also tried systematic exercises in mental relaxation and auto hypnosis (comparable with Yogi exercises) in order to make the body more insensitive to hunger and pain. If an individual's attention is fixed on the development of conscious awareness of automatic body functions, such a breathing, the alert functioning of the brain cortex can be reduced, and awareness of pain will diminish. This state of pain insensitivity can sometimes be achieved through autohypnotic exercises. But very few of our people were able to bring themselves into such anesthesia.

Finally we evolved this simple psychological trick: when you can no longer outwit the enemy or resist talking, the best thing to do is to talk too much. This was the idea: keep yourself sullen and act the fool; play the coward and confess more than there is to confess. Later we were able to verify that this method was successful in several cases. Scatterbrained simpletons confused the enemy much more than silent heroes whose stamina was finally undermined in spite of everything.

I had to flee Holland after a policeman warned me that my name had been mentioned in an interrogation. I had twice been questioned by the Nazis on minor matters and without bodily torture. When they later caught up with me in Blegium, probably as the result of a betrayal, I had to undergo a long initial examination in which I was beaten, fortunately not too seriously. The interview had started pleasantly enough. Apparently, the Nazi officer in charge thought he would be able to get information out of me through friendly methods. Indeed, we even had a discussion (since I am a psychiatrist) about the methods used in interrogation. But the officer's mood changed, and he behaved with all the sadistic characteristics we had come to expect from his type. Happily, I managed to escape from Belgium that very night before a more systematic and more torturous investigation could begin.

Arriving at the London headquarters after an adventurous trip through France and Spain, I became Chief of the Psychological Department of the Netherlands Forces in England. In this official position I was able to gather data on what was happening to the millions of victims of Nazi terror and torture. Later on I questioned and treated several escapees from internment and concentration camps. These people had become real experts in suffering. The variety of human reactions under those infernal circumstances taught us an ugly truth: the spirit of most men can be broken, men can be reduced to the level of animal behavior. Both torturer and victim finally lose all human dignity.

My government gave me the power to investigate a group of traitors and I also interrogated imprisoned Nazis. When I reveiw all these wartime experiences, all the confusion about courage and cowardice, treason, morale, and mental fortitude, I must confess that my eyes were only really opened after a study of the Nuremberg trials of the Nazi leaders. These trials gave us the real story of the systematic coercive methods used by the Nazis. At about the same time we began to learn more about the perverted psychological strategy Russia and her satellites were using.

Witchcraft and Torture

The specific techniques used in the modern world to break man's mind and will to extort confessions for political propaganda purposes are relatively new [in 1956] and highly refined. Yet enforced confession itself is nothing new. From time immemorial tyrants and dictators have needed these "voluntary" confessions to justify their own evil deeds. The knowledge that the human mind can be influenced, tamed, and broken down into servility is far older than the modern dictatorial concept of enforced indoctrination. The primative shaman used awe inspiring ritual to bring his victim into such a state of fright hypnosis that he yielded to all suggestions. The native on whom a spell of doom has been cast by the medicine man may become so hypnotized by his own fear that he simply sits down, accepts his fate, and dies (Malinowski).

Throughout history men have had an intuitive understanding that the mind can be manipulated. Elaborate strategies have been worked out to achieve this end. Ecstasy rituals, frightening masks, loud noises, eerie chants all have been used to compel the crowd to accept the beliefs of their leaders. Even if an ordinary man at first resists a cruel shaman or medicine man, the hypnotizing ritual gradually breaks his will.

More painful methods are not new either. When we study the old reports of the Inquisition, or of the many witch trials, both in Europe and America, we learn a great deal about these methods. The floating test is one example. Those accused of witchcraft were thrown into the river, their feet and hands tied together. If the body did not sink, the victim was immediately pulled out of the water and burned at the stake. The fact that he did not sink was proof positive of his guilt. If, on the other hand, the accused obeyed the law of gravity and sank to the bottom of the river, the drowned body was ceremoniously removed from the river and proclaimed innocent. Not much choice was left to the victim!

Man has been tremendously inventive in developing means for inflicting suffering on his fellow man. With refined passion he has devised techniques which provoke the most exquisite pain in the most vulnerable parts of the human body. The rack and the thumbscrew are age old instruments and have been used not only by primitive judges but also by so called civilized dictators and tyrants.

In order better to understand modern mental torture, we must constantly keep in mind the fact that from the earliest days bodily anguish and the rack were never meant merely to inflict pain on the victim. They may not have expressed their understanding in sophisticated terms, but the medieval judge and hangman were nevertheless aware that there is a peculiar spiritual relationship and mental interplay between the victim and the rest of the community. Much painful turture and hanging had to be done as public demonstrations. After suffering the most intense pain, the witch would not only confess to shocking sexual debaucheries with the devil, but would herself gradually come to believe the stories she had invented and would die convinced of her guilt. The whole ritual of interrogation and torture finally compelled her to yield to the fantasies of her judges and accusers. In the end she even yearned for death. She wanted to be burned at the stake in order to exorcise the devil and expiate her sins.

These same judges and hangman realized, too, that their witch trials were intended not only to torture the witches, but even more to torture the bystanders, who, albeit unconsciously, identified themselves with the victims. This is, of course, one of the reasons burnings and hangings were held in public and became the occasion for great pageants. Terror thus became widespread, and many judges spoke euphemistically of the preventive action of such torture. Psychologically, we can see this entire device as a blackmailing of human sympathy and the general tendency to identify with others.

As far back as 1563 the courageous Dutch physician Johannes Wier published his masterwork, _De_Praestigiis_Daemonum_ -- (_On_the_Delusions_About_Demons_) in which he states that the collective and voluntary self acusation of older women through which they exposed themselves to torture and death by their inquisitors was in itself an act inspired by the devil, a trick of demons, whose aim it was to doom not only the innocent women but also their reckless judges. Wier was the first medical man to introduce what became the psychiatric concept of DELUSION and mental blindness. Wherever his book had influence, the persecution of witches ceased, in some countries more than one hundred and fifty years before it was finally brought to an end throughout the civilized world. His work and his insights became one of the main instruments for fighting the witch delusion and physical torture (Baschwitz). Wier realized even then that witches were scapegoats for the inner confusion and desperation of their judges and of the "Zeitgeist" in general.

The Refinement of the Rack

All knowledge can be used either for good or for evil, and psychology is not immune to this general law. Psychology has delivered up to man new means of torture and intrusion into the mind. We must be more and more aware of what these methods and techniques are if we are successfully to fight them. They can often be more painful and mentally more paralyzing than the rack. Strong personalities can tolerate physical agony; often it serves to increase stubborn resistance. No matter what the constitution of the victim, physical torture finaly leads to a protective loss of consciousness. But to withstand mental torture leading to creeping mental breakdown demands an even stronger personality.

What we call brainwashing (a word derived from the Chinese "Hsi Nao") is an elaborate ritual of systematic indoctrination, conversion, and self accusation used to change non Communists into submissive followers of the party (Hunter). "Menticide" is a word coined by me and derived from "mens", the mind, and "caedere", to kill.

[NOTE: Here I followed the etymology used by the United Nations to form the word "genocide," meaning the systematic destruction of racial groups.]

Both words indicate the same perverted refinement of the rack, putting it on what appears to be a more acceptable level. But it is a thousand times worse and a thousand times more useful to the inquisitor.

Menticide is an old crime against the human mind and spirit but systematized anew. It is an organized system of psychological intervention and judicial perversion through which a powerful dictator can imprint his own opportunistic thoughts upon the minds of those he plans to use and destroy. The terrorized victims finally find themselves compelled to express complete conformity to the tyrant's wishes. Through court procedures, at which the victim mechanically reels off an inner record which has been prepared by his inquisitors during a preceding period, public opinion is lulled and thrown off guard. "A real traitor has been punished," people think. "The man has confessed!" His confession can be used for propaganda, for the cold war, to instill fear and terror, to accuse the enemy falsely, or to exercise a constant mental pressure upon others.

One important result of this procedure is the great confusion it creates in the mind of every observer, friend or foe. In the end no one knows how to distinguish truth from falsehood. The totalitarian potentate, in order to break down the minds of men, first needs widespread mental chaos and verbal confusion, because both paralyze his opposition and cause the morale of the enemy to deteriorate unless his adversaries are aware of the dictator's real aim. From then on he can start to build up his system of conformity.

In both the Mindszenty and the Schwable cases, we have documented reports of the techniques of menticide as it has been used to break the minds and wills of courageous men.

Let us look first at the case of Cardinal Mindszenty, accused of misleading the Hungarian people and collaboration with the enemies, the United States. In his expose' on Cardinal Mindszenty's imprisonment, Stephen K. Swift graphically describes three typical phases in the psychological "processing" of political prisoners. The first phase is directed toward extorting confession. The victim is bombarded with questions day and night. He is inadequately and irregularly fed. He is allowed almost no rest and remains in the interrogation chamber for hours on end while his inquisitors take turns with him. Hungry, exhuasted, his eyes blurred and aching under unshaded lamps, the prisoner becomes little more than a hounded animal.

    * "...when the Cardinal had been standing for sixty six hours [Swift reports], he closed his eyes and remained silent. He did not even reply to questions with denials. The colonel in charge of the shift tapped the Cardinal's shoulder and asked why he did not respond. The Cardinal answered: 'End it all. Kill me! I am ready to die!' He was told that no harm would come to him; that he could end it all simply by answering certain questions.

    * "...By Saturday forenoon he could hardly be recognized. He asked for another drink and this time it was refused. His feet and legs had swollen to such proportions that they caused him intense pain; he fell down several times."

To the horrors the accused victim suffers from without must be added the horrors from within. He is pursued by the unsteadiness of his own mind, which cannot always produce the same answer to a repeated question. As a human being with a conscience he is pursued by possible hidden guilt feelings, however pious he may have been, that undermine his rational awareness of innocence. The panic of the "brainwashee" is the total confusion he suffers about all concepts. His evaluations and norms are undermined. He cannot believe in anything objective any more except in the dictated and indoctrinated logic of those who are more powerful than he. The enemy knows that, far below the surface, human life is built up of inner contradictions. He uses this knowledge to defeat and confuse the brainwashee. The continual shift of interrogators makes it ever more impossible to believe in consecutive thinking. Hardly has the victim adjusted himself to one inquisitor when he has to change his focus of alertness to another one.

Yet, this inner clash of norms and concepts, this inner contradiction of ideologies and beliefs is part of the philosohpical sickenss of our time!

As a social being the Cardinal is pursued by the need for good human relationships and companionship. The constantly reiterated suggestion of his guilt urges him toward confession. As a suffering individual he is blackmailed by an inner need to be left alone and undisturbed, if only for a few minutes. From within and without he is inexorably driven toward signing the confession prepared by his persecutors. Why should he resist any longer? There are no visible witnesses to his heroism. He cannot prove his moral courage and rectitude after his death. The core of the strategy of menticide is the taking away of all hope, all anticipation, all belief in a future. It destroys the very elements which keep the mind alive. The victim is utterly alone.

[NOTE: This continual attack on human conscience and guilt by unconscious self accusations is brilliantly depicted by Franz Kafka in _The_Trial_. In this novel the victim never knows of what he is accused but his inner guilt leads him to conviction. Kafka anticipated the age of blackmailing into confession. His novel was written before the 1930s. The same theme has been treated from a psychological point of view by Theodor Reik in his _Confession_Compulsion_and_the_Need_for_Punishment_.]

If the prisoner's mind proves too resistant, narcotics are given to confuse it: mescaline, marijuana, morphine, barbiturates, alcohol. If his body collapses before his mind capitulates, he receives stimulants: benzedrine, caffein, coramine, all of which help to preserve his consciousness until he confesses. Many of the narcotics and stimuli which ultimately help to induce mental dependency and enforced confusion can also create an amneisa, often a complete forgetting of the torture itself. The torture techniques achieve the desired effect, but the victim forgets what has actually happened during the interrogation. The clinicians who do therapeutic work with amphetamine derivatives, which when injected into the blood stream help patients to remember long frgotten experiences, are familiar with the drug's ability to bring soothing forgetfulness of the period during which the patient was drugged and questioned.


Next the victim is trained to accept his own confession, much as an animal is trained to perform tricks. False admissions are reread, repeated, hammered into his brain. He is forced to reproduce in his memory again and again the fantasied offenses, fictitious details which ultimately convince him of his criminality. In the first stage he is forced into mental submissiveness by others. In the second stage he has entered a state of autohypnosis, convincing himself of fabricated crimes. According to Swift: "The questions during the interrogation now dealt with details of the Cardinal's 'confession.' First his own statements were read to him; then statements of other prisoners accused of complicity with him; then elaborations of those statements. Sometimes the Cardinal was morose, sometimes greatly disturbed and excited. But he answered all questions willingly, repeated all sentences once, twice, or even three times when he was told to do so." (Lassio)

In the third and final phase of interrogation and menticide the accused, now completely conditioned and accepting his own imposed guilt, is trained to bear false witness against himself and others. He doesn't have to convince himself any more through autohypnosis; he only speaks "his master's voice." He is prepared for trial, softened completely; he becomes remorseful and willing to be sentenced. He is a baby in the hands of his inquisitors, fed as a baby and soothed by words as a baby.

[NOTE: A more extended survey of the different psychological stages in menticide and brainwashing will be given at the end of Chapter Four Why Do They Yield?: The Psychodynamics of False Confession.]

Menticide in Korea

Now let us take a look at the Schwable case. In its general outline it is simlar to the Mindszenty story; it differs only in details. As an officer of the United States Marine Corps, fighting with the United Nations in Korea, he is taken prisoner by the enemy. The colonel expects to be protected by international law and by the regulations regarding officer prisoners of war, which have been accepted by all countries. However, it slowly dawns on him that he is being subjected to a kind of treatment very different from what he expected. The enemy looks on him not as a prisoner of war, but as a victim who can be used for propaganda purposes.

He is subjected to slow but constant pressures devised to break him down mentally. Humiliation, rough, inhuman treatment, degradation, intimidation, hunger, exposure to extreme cold all have been used to crumble his will and to soften him. They need to wangle military secrets out of him and to use him as a tool in their propaganda machine. He feels completely alone. He is surrounded by filth and vermin. For hours on end he has to stand up and answer the questions his interrogators hurl at him. He develops arthritic backache and diarrhea. He is not allowed to wash or shave. He doesn't know what will ahppen to him next. This treatment goes on for weeks.

Then the hours of systematic and repetitious interrogation and oppression increase. He no longer dares to trust his own memory. There are new teams of investigators every day, and each new team points out his increasing errors and mistakes. He cannot sleep any more. Daily his interrogators tell him they have plenty of time, and he realizes that in this respect at least they are telling the truth. He beings to doubt whether he can resist their seductive propositions. If he will just unburden himself of his guilt, they tell him, he will be better treated.

The inquisitor is treacherously kind and knows exactly what he wants. He wants the victim captured by the influence of a slowly induced hypnosis. He wants a well documented confession that the American army used bacteriological warfare, that the captive himself took part in such germ warfare. The inquisitor wants this confession in writing because it will make a convincing impression and will shock the world. China is plagued by hunger and epidemics; such a confession will explain the high disease rate and exculpate the Chinese government, whose popularity is at a low ebb. So the colonel has to be prepared for a systematic confession, made before an international group of Communist experts. Mentally and physically he is weakened, and every day the Communist "truths" are imprinted on his mind.

The colonel has in fact become hypnotized; he is now able to reproduce for his jailers bits and pieces of the confession they want from him. It is a well known scientific fact that the passive memory often remembers facts learned under hynosis better than those learned in a state of alert consciousness. He is even able to write some of it down. Eventually, all the little pieces fit, like a jigsaw puzzle, into a complete, well organized whole; they form part of a document which was in fact prepared beforehand by his captors. This document is placed in the colonel's hands, and he is even allowed to make some minor changes in the phrasing before he signs it.

By now, the colonel has been completely broken. He has given in. All sense of reality is gone; identification with the enemy is complete. For weeks after signing the confession he is in a state of depression. His only wish is to sleep, to have rest from it all.

A man will often try to hold out beyond the limits of his endurance because he continues to believe that his tormentors have some basic morality, that they will finally realize the enormity of their crimes and will leave him alone. This is a delusion. The only way to strengthen one's defenses against an organized attack on the mind and will is to understand better what the enemy is trying to do and to outwit him. Of course, one can vow to hold out until death, but even the relief of death is in the hands of the inquisitor. People can be brought to the threshold of death and then be stimulated into life again so that the torments can be renewed. Attempts at suicide are foreseen and can be forestalled.

In my opinion hardly anyone can resist such treatment. It all depends on the ego strength of the person and the exhaustive technique of the inquisitor. Each man has his own limit of endurance, but that this limit can nearly always be reached and even surpassed is supported by clinical evidence. Nobody can predict for himself how he will handle a situation when he is called to the test. The official United States report on brainwashing [See the "New York Times", August 18, 1955] admits that "virtually all American P.O.W.s collaborated at one time or another in one degree or another, lost their identity as Americans...thousands lost their will to live," and so forth. The British report [See the "New York Times", February 27, 1955} gives a statistical survey about the abuse of the P.O.W.s. According to this report one third of the soldiers absorbed enough indoctrination to be classified as Communist sympathizers.

This same report describes in a more extended way some of the sadistic means used by the enemy:

"If a prisoner accepted Communist doctrines, his life became easier, according to the men's stories. But if a prisoner resisted Communist doctrines, the Chinese considred him a criminal and reactionary deserving of any brutalitites. the tortures applied to the 'reactionaries' included:

    * "Making a prisoner stand at attention or sit with legs outstretched in complete silence from 4:30 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. and constantly waking him during the few hours allowed for sleep.

    * "Keeping prisoners in solitary confinement in boxes about five by three by two feet. A private of the Gloucester Regiment spent more than six months in one of these.

    * "Withholding liquids for days 'to help self reflection'.

    * "Binding a prisoner with a rope passed over a beam, one end fixed as a hangman's noose round his neck and the other end tied to his ankles. He was then told that if he slipped or bent his knees he would be committing suicide.

    * "Forcing a prisoner to kneel on jagged rocks and hold a large rock over his head with arms extended. It took a man who had undergone this treatment days to recover the ability to walk.

    * "At one camp North Korean jailers pushed a pencil like piece of wood or metal through a hole in the cell door and made the prisoner hold the inner end in his teeth. Without warning a sentry would knock the outer end sidewise, breaking the man's teeth or splitting the sides of his mouth. Sometimes the rod was rammed inward against the back of the mouth or down the throat.

    * "Prisoners were marched barefooted to the frozen Yalu River, water was poured over their feet and they were kept for hours with their feet frozen to the ice to 'reflect' on their 'crimes.'"

Time, fear, and continual pressure are known to create a menticidal hypnosis. The conscious part of the personality no longer takes part in the automatic confessions. The brainwashee lives in a trance, repeating the record grooved into him ind by somebody else. Fortunately, this, too, is known: as soon as the victim returns to normal circumstances, the panicky and hypnotic spell evaporates, and he again awakens into reality.

This is what happened to Colonel Schwable. True, he confessed to crimes he did not commit, but he repudiated his confession as soon as he was returned to a familiar environment.

When, during the military inquiry into the Schwable case, I was called upon to testify as an expert on menticide, I told the court of my deep conviction that nearly anybody subjected to the treatment meted out to Colonel Schwable could be forced to write and sign a similar confession.

"Anyone in this room, for instance?" the colonel's attorney asked me, looking in turn at each of the officers sitting in judgment on this new and difficult case.

And in good conscience I could reply, firmly: "Anyone in this room."

It is now technically possible to bring the human mind into a condition of enslavement and submission. The Schwable case and the cases of other prisoners of war are tragic examples of this, made even more tragic by our lack of understanding of the limits of heroism. We are just beginning to understand what these limits are, and how they are used, both politically and psycholgically, by the totalitarians. We have long since come to recognize the breast beating confession and the public recantation as propaganda tricks; now we are beginning to see ever more clearly how the totalitarians use menticide: deliberately, openly, unashamedly, as part of their oficial policy, as a means of consolidating and maintaining their power, though, of course, they give a different explanation to the whole procedure it's all confessions of real and treacherous crimes.

This brutal totalitarian technique has at least one virtue, however. It is obvious and unmistakable, and we are learning to be on our guard against it, but as we shall see later, there are other subtler forms of mental intervention. They can be just as dangerous as the direct assault, precisely because they are more subtle and hence more difficult to detect. Often we are not aware of their action at all. They influence the mind so slowly and indirectly that we may not even realize what they have done to us.

Like totalitarian menticide, some of these less obvious forms of mental manipulation are political in purpose. Others are not. Even if they differ in intent, they can have the same consequences.

These subtle menticidal forces operate both within the mind and outside it. They have been strengthened in their effect by the growth in complexity of our civilization. The modern means of mass communication bring the entire world daily into each man's home; the techniques of propaganda and salesmanship have been refined and systematized; there is scarcely any hiding place from the constant visual and verbal assault on the mind. The pressures of daily life impel more and more people to seek an easy escape from responsibility and maturity. Indeed, it is difficult to withstand these pressures; to many the offer of a political panacea is very tempting, to others the offer of escape through alcohol, drugs, or other artificial pleasures is irresistable.

Free men in a free society must learn not only to recognize this stealthy attack on mental integrity and fight it, but must learn also what there is in side man's mind that makes him vulnerable to this attack, what it is that makes him, in many cases, actually long for a way out of the responsibilities that republican democracy and maturity place on him.


Posted by littlebirdtheoutcast at 11:03 AM EDT
Monday, 21 April 2008
What are we doing? Please listen, and then think!
Topic: Abuse of our troops

Please, What are we doing? It's just past April19, both the Oklahoma Bombing, and Waco, and please ofcourse Randy Weaver andhis inocent un-armed wife and baby? On their own front porch?

Where were we? Where are we now?  Why doesn't God do something? He did he sent you and I?  I have been made a fool of by the John Hagee ministry? I don't go to church, and I used to watch the Pentacostals on tv.  Please view two important videos there.

John Hagee used one of my sermons without my permission, and he did not give me, nor Mother Thereasa any credits? I don't go to church anymore, I can't find one that tells the truth? So organized religion has me on one web page telling what a wonderful preacher John Hagee is? He is an idiot on his way to hell. period? The sermon I wrote on Job, was mine and I can prove it.

Please, as I speak above about things we as Americans should care about,

I have several videos on about the troops. My name is littlebirdtheoutcast.  Please visit both and and insert in their search engine, "Troops against the war" and you will hear the most gut wrenching stories. Our troops are honorable, but our government has been on the down slide for nearly a century.

Please visit, and go through them?

and also and listen, and search your heart. Are they not putting their lives on the line? And why should we sit like a peice of lard, while our troops are begging us for help? Where were you in Waco? Should we not of protested? Where were we in the 911 bombing? Why would any human being say that the government did it, and then go to prison for it, unless there is some thing to it? is a wonderful place for information.

Please help our troops, if you don't have the courage, would you send these to your friends? Please do something? Please help our troops.


Posted by littlebirdtheoutcast at 10:48 PM EDT
Updated: Monday, 21 April 2008 10:56 PM EDT
Sunday, 28 October 2007
Our Precious Troops, Military, and families
Now Playing: The Precious Soldier
Topic: Abuse of our troops

patent_number_is_5242820.html .This government has murdered people like Pat Tillman,(which had to be a serious blunder, He must of had something to say or it would take a sharp shooter like in Vietnam with a m-16 rifle to shoot him three times in the head before he fell.) This is about all of our military, and we think 450,000 sick and dieing of Urainium Depletion,vacines that are 60 year old cow pus is just a little more then we as Americans are willing to forgive or bear?


There's also the issue of the blood substitute Hemopure which is type E cow's  blood. I heard one who is saying his blood type went from O+ to A

We protest you filthy dragons, you monstors. You are treading on thin ice, I even heard 10,000 of our military went AWOL to protect the things that are dear to them, like liberty,freedom,truth, and our precious constitution that we have sworn on an oath to protect, even if it means our lives, livihood, and the like.


Here is the video I present to you, with outrage, screaming outrage that you have created another holicast, may we say...........not even. I don't think so, hey.

<a href="patent_number_is_5242820.html">Patent</a>   |

<a href=""> Video</>     |
<a href=" ">Arts Parts</>     |
<a href=" ">Patented disease 5242820  </a>  |
 <a href="">Our Troops  are Holy</a> |

<object width="530" height="370"><param name="movie" value=""></param><embed src="" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="530" height="370"></embed></object>



Posted by littlebirdtheoutcast at 4:21 AM EDT

Newer | Latest | Older

Open Community
Post to this Blog